ZRP
Tuca Zbarcea & Asociatii

Deloitte Legal survey: Costs of dismissal in Romania, among the lowest

10 Aprilie 2018   |   BizLawyer

The analysis compares six costs of dismissal in 45 countries.

 
 
Romania counts among the countries with the lowest costs of dismissal for employers in Europe, either due to individual or economic reasons, according to the fourth edition of the International Dismissal Survey published by Deloitte Legal, represented in Romania by Reff & Associates.

The analysis compares six costs of dismissal in 45 countries. The survey data represents three separate cases with different seniority and remuneration packages.

“Our survey shows that the costs of dismissal in are generally lower than in other countries and are not influenced by the variable seniority. An explanation for this is found in the provisions of the Romanian Labor Code, which makes no distinction in the dismissal conditions due to seniority,” said Florentina Munteanu, Partner and head of the employment law practice at Reff & Associates. “Many employers have regulated dismissal conditions within collective bargaining agreements and from our experience we can confirm that seniority is a variable influencing the severance package. However, such agreements are of limited applicability (at employer or sector of activity level), therefore we cannot consider this practice as generally applicable at the level of employers in Romania.”


Raluca Bontas, Partner Global Employer Services Deloitte Romania added: “The computation base is an explanation for which Romania ranks with lower dismissal costs in the case of the employees with medium pay, according to the survey. Besides the ranking, one has to also look for how dismissal is translated into local legislation of the countries surveyed, which varies a lot.”

What is also interesting to see from the results of the survey is that there are a number of countries where post-dismissal review by the courts cannot result in reinstatement of the employees and in those countries costs of dismissal are among the highest. In Romania, as well as in France, Germany, Greece, Italy and many other countries, the courts of law may reinstate the employee upon an illegal or unfair dismissal decision and such a decision will ultimately have an influence to the total cost of the dismissal. Nevertheless, such cost cannot be anticipated in advance and it is difficult to quantify it from the beginning.  
 
Key highlights of the survey:
•    A number of countries, i.e. France, Italy, and the Netherlands have reformed their dismissal legislation in order to increase labor flexibility and/or financial predictability of dismissal cost.
•    In over 75% of the surveyed countries the employee may be reinstated by the courts if the reasons for dismissals are deemed unjustified. Upfront approval is only required in two of the surveyed countries, the Netherlands and Ecuador. In only a limited number of countries, the employer has absolute power to dismiss without any possibility of reinstatement.
•    In almost all surveyed countries, seniority (the length of service within a certain company) is the key factor in determining the level of dismissal cost. However, over 60% of all participating countries have capped either the notice period or the severance indemnity or both.
•    Basic dismissal concepts such as dismissal for serious cause and protection against dismissal of certain categories of employees (e.g. maternity, educational leave, political mandate, etc.) are present in almost all countries. Among others, dismissal of employees in Romania is forbidden during maternity leave, paid leave or during exercising of an eligible position within a union body.
•    In some countries, termination is only possible for the reasons stipulated explicitly by law (Romania is amongst these countries).
•    If we compare all scenarios for dismissal with an objective individual reason or economic reason, we see that the dismissal cost varies widely between legislations, without any geographical preference.
•    If we compare all scenarios for dismissal without any objective reason, employers in certain European countries encounter the highest costs, even though huge regional variations continue to exist.
•    The highest increase in dismissal cost is triggered by the severance indemnity or indemnity for unlawful dismissal which is due if an employee is dismissed without an objective reason.
•    A limited comparison for Latin American and Asian participants―with this baseline sample it is difficult to compare the regions and draw general conclusions.

 To read full results of the survey, please see here.

 
 

PNSA

 
 

ARTICOLE PE ACEEASI TEMA

ARTICOLE DE ACELASI AUTOR


 

Ascunde Reclama
 
 

POSTEAZA UN COMENTARIU


Nume *
Email (nu va fi publicat) *
Comentariu *
Cod de securitate*







* campuri obligatorii


Articol 7 / 1984
 

Ascunde Reclama
 
 
 
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
PeliFilip, desemnată „Firma de avocatură a anului” în România pentru a doua oară de către Chambers Europe
A 45-a tranzacție a echipei de M&A de la RTPR Allen & Overy, din ultimii 4 ani, a fost finalizată săptămâna trecută la Amsterdam. Ce spun avocații implicați
Radu și Asociații SPRL | EY Law asistă cu succes unul dintre liderii globali în domeniul comercializării semințelor
Cum lucrează echipa de concurență de la Stratulat Albulescu Attorneys at Law. Casa de avocați are trei parteneri cu o mare experiență în această practică și legături cu firmele internaționale
Vasile, Buciuman și Asociații, o nouă societate de tip boutique, promite o abordare diferită pe piața avocaturii de business
Cum lucrează echipa Suciu Popa în proiectele GDPR. Reglarea tuturor aspectelor presupune un proces amplu și continuu, nu se mai aplică checklist-ul clasic de audit legal
Concursul de Procese Simulate de Drept Civil, organizat de PeliFilip în colaborare cu ELSA şi cu ajutorul JS5 şi CAB, și-a desemnat câștigătorii
Marieta Avram Law Office a asistat BRD-GSG la redactarea memoriului adresat Înaltei Curți de Casație și Justiție în vederea soluționării problemei juridice de drept bancar referitoare la suspendarea urmăririi silite prin poprire bancară
Stratulat Albulescu ridică numărul partenerilor la 10. Cristiana Fernbach a fost promovată din poziția de Counsel la cea de Partener
Decizie definitivă privind obligațiile fiscale care “sunt suspendate” ca efect al depunerii unei scrisori de garanție bancară, dar care rămân în continuare „restante” în viziunea autorităților fiscale
Patru case locale de avocați, în topul global al celor mai bune firme implicate în arbitraje internaționale. ZRP, Suciu Popa și Leaua & Asociații și-au păstrat pozițiile, TZA completează “plutonul” elitei GAR 100
LegiTeam: BOHÂLȚEANU ȘI ASOCIAȚII recrutează avocați cu experienţă
 
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
  • BizBanker

  • BizLeader

      in curand...
  • SeeNews

    in curand...