ZRP
Tuca Zbarcea & Asociatii

Schoenherr: First decisions prohibiting concentrations issued in Bulgaria

08 August 2018   |   Galina Petkova, Attorney at Law - Schoenherr

Both decisions concern politically sensitive sectors (media and energy) and are currently largely criticised for their lack of valid economic arguments.

 
 
On 19 July, 2018 the Bulgarian Commission for the Protection of Competition (the "CPC") prohibited two concentrations. The first being the sale of the second largest media conglomerate in Bulgaria, Nova Broadcasting Group AD ("Nova Broadcasting"), (owner of Nova TV), to PPF Bidco, (owned by Czech businessman Petr Kellner), and secondly the sale of CEZ's assets in Bulgaria, which include its energy distribution business, trade business and some small renewable energy parks to a Bulgarian company, Inercom, which maintains three solar power stations in the country.

Both decisions concern politically sensitive sectors (media and energy) and are currently largely criticised for their lack of valid economic arguments.

Basically, in both decisions, the commission's legal arguments are given in several paragraphs only and it remains unclear why the acquisition of companies which are not competitors (or at least not major competitors) is classified as potential strengthening of dominant positions of the united group, which may impede the competition.


In both prohibited concentrations the overlap on the horizontal and vertical market/s is none or almost non-existant. Also, both concentrations concern acquisitions of large undertakings in Bulgaria (with market share in certain relevant markets which is close to or exceed 40 %) while the market share of the acquirer is insignificant (up to 5%).

Thus, for instance, in the prohibited concentration of Nova TV, the parties activities overlap only in the market of e-commerce, where both the acquirer and the target hold a market share of up to 5 %. Indeed, the Nova Broadcasting Group holds a market share of approx. 40 % in the markets of TV distribution and TV advertising. In these two markets, however, the acquirer is not active in Bulgaria, and its market share is nil. Despite the lack of actual threatening horizontal or vertical overlapping, the CPC considers that the "significant amount of mass information means, which would be accumulated by the concentrated group, would lead to its significant advantage over the other participants in the media market. Thus, the participants in the concentration would have the incentive and actual possibility to change their trade policy (e.g. by limiting the access, price increases or changes in the terms of the concluded agreements)."

In the other decision prohibiting the sale of CEZ, the CPC found that there was a horizontal overlap between the participants' activities in the concentration on the market for the production and wholesale supply of electricity from photovoltaic power plants. CPC also states that the concentration generates vertical effects on downstream markets, namely the markets for electricity distribution, and supply and trade with electricity.

The CPC does not quote the market shares of the participants on these markets. Still, none of the parties hold significant market share in these markets. The CPC, however, explains the potential threat for the competition by analysing the legislative changes in Bulgaria, which concern the buy-out of electric energy produced by small plants with a capacity exceeding 4 megawatts (under the new regime the sale is made on the energy exchange stock, while under the former regime the energy of small plants was purchased under preferential prices). The analysis of the CPC, however, fails to explain why the concentration would be detrimental for the concentration under the new legal regime (since no substantial actual change would not occur because of the concentration).

It also remains largely unclear as to why recent concentrations with almost identical factual backgrounds concerning markets as those under the prohibited decisions were approved without conditions, while these concentrations were directly prohibited by the CPC.

The decisions of the CPC can be appealed before the Supreme Administrative Court in the second instance. It remains to be seen as to what will happen.

 
 

PNSA

 
 

ARTICOLE PE ACEEASI TEMA

ARTICOLE DE ACELASI AUTOR


     

    Ascunde Reclama
     
     

    POSTEAZA UN COMENTARIU


    Nume *
    Email (nu va fi publicat) *
    Comentariu *
    Cod de securitate*







    * campuri obligatorii


    Articol 123 / 2165
     

    Ascunde Reclama
     
    BREAKING NEWS
    ESENTIAL
    LegiTeam: Reff & Associates is looking for Litigation Manager
    LegiTeam: Reff & Associates is looking for Senior Litigation Lawyer
    Hotărâre definitivă obținută de Niculeasa Law Firm în fața ICCJ cu privire la caracterul subsidiar al procedurii penale în raport de procedura fiscală pentru o creanță fiscală de aproximativ 4 mil. €
    Echipa Stratulat Albulescu & Asociaţii urcă spre pragul de 40 de avocați și ia în calcul extinderea în afara Capitalei. M&A și Real Estate rămân în topul sectoarelor care vor aduce, probabil, cele mai multe tranzacții și proiecte și în acest an
    LegiTeam: ZRP recrutează avocat stagiar pentru departamentul Litigii
    Mihai Selegean, Head of Legal la BRD-GSG, printre cei mai buni profesioniști europeni nominalizați de Lexology. Pe lista scurtă pentru European Counsel Awards 2019 mai este un român
    Gabriel Zbârcea, Managing Partner Ţuca Zbârcea & Asociaţii: În România, o firmă de avocați poate ajunge la afaceri de 20 mil. € anual. În anii următori se va consolida tendința de divizare a pieței
    KPMG Legal cooptează doi avocați de talie grea. Vlad Peligrad și Cătălin Oroviceanu se alătură echipei ca parteneri coordonatori
    Cum văd partenerii Noerr evoluția firmei în perioada următoare. Prof. dr. Jörg K Menzer, Head CEE Offices, Noerr: În 2019 vom mări și echipele, dar și baza de clienți. În ciuda ultimelor schimbări juridice din Ungaria, România și Polonia – pe alocuri foarte controversate – am remarcat că există în continuare interes pentru fuziuni, achiziții și investiții noi în regiune
    KPMG Legal – Toncescu Mihai Olteanu SPRL a câștigat definitiv anularea taxelor vamale, antidumping și TVA impuse de autoritățile vamale la importurile produselor din afara spațiului UE pentru unul dintre cei mai importanți producători de piese pentru industria automotive
    Cei mai buni avocați de fuziuni și achiziții din România. Clasamentul Chambers Global 2019
    La un an de la înființarea departamentului de drept penal, CLO își mărește echipa de „white collar crime”. Departamentul numără, la început de an, 6 avocați specializați
     
    Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
    • BizBanker

    • BizLeader

        in curand...
    • SeeNews

      in curand...