Developing Renewables in Romania: PUZ or Pass?
17 Octombrie 2022 Mihaela Nyerges, Partener - Vlăsceanu, Nyerges & Partners
The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate.
| |
One of the most frequent questions asked there days by renewables investors and developers is whether PUZ is still required for developing small renewable power projects in Romania (below 50 ha). The relevance of this question is huge as the answer impacts on the duration of the development process with up to 9 months.
To answer, brief preliminary comments should be made regarding the general construction permitting rules, depending on the various types of lands.
1. Types of lands
The following lands qualifications are relevant for the current topic:
(i) from the perspective of their location, the lands can be (a) located intra-muros (within the buildable perimeter of the respective territorial administrative unit) or (b) located extra-muros (outside such perimeter);
(ii) from the perspective of their destination, the lands can be, among others, (a) agricultural lands or (b) yards-constructions lands;
(iii) from the perspective of their fertility class, the agricultural lands are split into 5 fertility classes, ranging from very fertile land (Class I) to very low fertile land (Class V); the fertility class is established based soil analysis made by experts within the county Office of Pedological Studies.
2. General construction rule
As a general rule, all constructions may be erected only on lands (i) located intra-muros and (ii) qualifying as “yards-constructions”.
If the targeted land qualifies as extra-muros and agricultural land (which is typically the case with the land suitable for renewable projects),
(i) the land should be first requalified from extra-muros into intra-muros land by means of a PUZ;
(ii) no additional formalities should be done for converting the land from agricultural land to “yards-construction” land, as such conversion occurs automatically through the issuance of the building permit.
3. Exception dedicated to renewable energy projects
Late July this year, an exception from the above rule was adopted, expressly allowing the construction of renewable power generation projects on extra-murros lands if the following conditions are met:
(i) land has fertility class III, IV and V; and
(ii) land does not exceed 50 ha.
Therefore, projects falling within the above limitations no longer need to obtain requalification of the land from extra-muros to intra-murros land through a PUZ.
4. Need of a PUZ in case of renewable projects below 50 ha
Therefore, do we still need or not a PUZ for developing renewable on land with fertility class III, IV and V which does not exceeds 50 ha?
The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate. We have also encountered a case where the authority changed its mind after having issued an urban planning certificate whereby no PUZ was requested.
Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that PUZ has multiple roles, not just the introduction of land into intra-murros area, as explained below:
(i) according to the general construction law (with certain exceptions not applicable hereto), the building permit may be issued only if (a) there is an urban documentation approved regarding the respective land, setting out the legal, technical and economical regime of the land and (b) the envisaged construction is compatible with the rules set out by the respective urban documentation;
(ii) all communes and towns in Romania must have an urban documentation approved – namely a general urban plan (“PUG”) adopted by the local authorities setting out (a) the function of each land (such as residential, industrial etc.) and (b) the applicable urbanism parameters and limitations (such as land occupation percentage, land occupation coefficient, height regime, etc.);
(iii) PUG is a sufficient urbanism documentation for the issuance of a building permit if (a) it provides the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land and (b) the envisaged project is compatible with the regime set out thereby;
(iv) if (a) the PUG does not provide the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land or (b) the envisaged construction is not compatible with the rules set out by the PUG for the targeted land or (c) there is no PUG in place (for example, it was never approved, it expired, it was cancelled in court or suspended), the developer must obtain a zonal urban plan (“PUZ”) whereby to adopt/amend the urbanism rules so that they are compatible with the project;
(v) generally, PUGs do not regulate extra-muros land or do not establish an urbanism function/regime compatible with renewable projects;
(vi) very recently, a new exception from the need to adopt an urbanism documentation was added in case of other specific types of constructions allowed on extra murros land.
Further to the above, PUZs are still needed for developing renewable projects on lands below 50 ha in order to establish the function and urbanism parameters of the respective land that are compatible with the envisaged project. Nevertheless, a case-by-case assessment should be made regarding the PUG rules applicable on the respective land. Such assessment should be made by the consultants of the developer, without simply relying on the assessment made by the local authorities when issuing the urbanism certificate.
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
| Articol 1014 / 4652 | Următorul articol |
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |
LegiTeam: CMS CAMERON MCKENNA NABARRO OLSWANG LLP SCP is looking for: Associate | Commercial group (3-4 years definitive ̸ qualified lawyer)
Popescu & Asociații rămâne un reper de seriozitate și profunzime, cu o cultură care privilegiază calitatea, consecvența și responsabilitatea | De vorbă cu Adrian Chirvase (Partener) despre 2025 ca an de consolidare: portofoliu diversificat, retenție ridicată, tehnologie folosită pragmatic și o echipă unită, pregătită pentru mandate transfrontaliere
Filip & Company a asistat Veranda Obor S.A. în obținerea unei finanțări de 36 milioane euro de la CEC Bank. Echipa, coordonată de Alexandra Manciulea (partner) și Rebecca Marina (counsel)
O promovare din interior care confirmă meritocrația și creșterea organică într-una dintre cele mai puternice firme de avocatură din România | De vorbă cu Ramona Pentilescu, avocatul care a crescut în PNSA de la primii pași în profesie până la poziția de partener, despre vocație, rigoare și reperele care i-au susținut evoluția profesională într-un cadru în care contează respectul pentru profesie și coerența valorilor
Neagu Dinu Partners, firmă înființată anul trecut, își face rapid loc în prim-planul practicii de Litigii & Arbitraj din piața locală, cu un model de lucru pragmatic, în care partenerii cooordonează dosarele și păstrează controlul calității în mandate complexe | De vorbă cu Simona Neagu (Partener fondator) despre așteptările tot mai ridicate ale clienților, colaborările internaționale și disciplina internă care susține performanța echipei
LSEG Deals Intelligence | Cum s-au împărțit fuziunile mid-market, anul trecut, pe firmele de avocatură active și la București. CMS a fost pe podium în Europa și pe primul loc în Estul continentului, unde s-au mai evidențiat Schoenherr și Clifford Chance. Tranzacții mai multe, dar de valoare mai mică în Europa Estică
Studenții la Drept sunt invitați la Turneul de dezbateri „Law and Life in Contest” organizat de Bondoc și Asociații
LegiTeam | RTPR is looking for a litigation lawyer (3-4 years of experience)
Filip & Company asistă Continental în vânzarea OESL către Regent. Alexandru Bîrsan (managing partner) a coordonat echipa
ICC Arbitration Breakfast revine în România cu cea de-a doua ediție - 18 martie, în București
În litigiile fiscale, Artenie, Secrieru & Partners este asociată cu rigoarea și eficiența, grație unei combinații rare de viziune, metodă și capacitate de execuție în dosare grele. De vorbă cu coordonatorii practicii despre noul ritm al inspecțiilor, reîncadrările tot mai frecvente și importanța unei apărări unitare, susținute de specialiști și expertize, într-un context fiscal tot mai imprevizibil
NNDKP obține o decizie semnificativă pentru litigiile privind prețurile de transfer din partea de vest a României. Echipă mixtă, cu avocați din Timișoara și București, în proiect
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...









RSS





