ZRP
Tuca Zbarcea & Asociatii

WOLF THEISS | Romania: What it takes to sign employment documents electronically?

11 August 2021   |   Adelina Iftime-Blagean (Counsel) and Andreea Stan (Senior Associate) - WOLF THEISS

With less physical contact and a move towards more flexibility in a working environment, the Romanian legislator proposed a solution: GEO 36/2021.

 
 
Under Romanian law, employment contracts must be concluded in writing for validity purposes.This justifies the extra care companies invest in a legally binding execution of these documents, as well as the growing interest in E-signing employment documents in Romania.

While the core legislation regarding E-signature (eIDAS Regulations and Law 455/2001) was allowing  the E-signing on all contracts requiring the written format for validity purposes (therefore including employment contracts), though indeed only in the format of the qualified E-signature, some say that the electronic execution of employment contracts was officially recognized in the employment legislation via GEO 36/2021 amending the Labor Code as of May 2021. Prior to this "official recognition" most employers preferred the traditional approach of signing in ink (despite any "headaches" associated with this approach, especially concerning cross-border retention), while few used E-signing for employment contracts (most of the times when it comes to retention of high professionals who already owned a qualified E-signature). A minority of employers took advantage of the lack of express interdiction and signed contracts in counterparts where the employee signed in wet ink signature and the employer electronically, with qualified E-signature. While we cannot fully endorse this lastly described practice from a legal perspective, let's face it: it has some cool practical advantages.


With less physical contact and a move towards more flexibility in a working environment, the Romanian legislator proposed a solution: GEO 36/2021. This piece of legislation was intended to bring additional flexibility in terms of execution of the employment documents. As it turned out, however, it introduced legal requirements in addition to those under the eIDAS Regulations and severely limited the de facto use of electronic signature in this area. It basically created a standstill surrounding use of electronic signature in employment relations at the time.

On 25 July 2021, Law 208/2021 amending and supplementing GEO 36/2021 entered into force. Law 208/2021 intends to partially eliminate the previously introduced legal and technical requirements and to simplify the use of electronic signature in employment relations.

Recent changes:

Law 208/2021 implements two main changes:

►    elimination of additional formalities (electronic time stamp and electronic seal) upon electronic execution of employment contracts; and
►    more flexibility when executing other employment documents.

We include below a comparative analysis of these changes:



Technical clarifications:

As legal experts, the technical subtilities sometimes elude us. However, to be able to fully understand the changes to the Labor Code, we collected intelligence from providers of electronic signature and here's what we found out:
♦    The time stamp and the electronic seal are indeed separate products, in addition to the standard digital content of the e-signature products (advanced, respectively qualified). The changes brought by GEO 36/2021 were therefore indeed confusing and inefficient.
♦    The (qualified) electronic seal is the equivalent of the company stamp - the link is to the organization and not the actual signatory on behalf of the organization.
♦    The advanced E-signature is rather problematic since the technical conditions and criteria set out by art. 26 EIDAS are not clear and precise. Two options are available at this point: (i) the provider issues the product as being an advanced E-signature and warrants that the conditions are met; or (ii) the provider issues a (simple) signature and the user/client undertakes the additional burden to effectively link a certain individual to the signature (e.g. via internal policies). The second option sometimes leaves much of the duty of proof to the person using the signature or to the person alleging the signature is valid, which can create practical difficulties to say the least. Therefore, as the product is not standardized, many providers prefer not to offer it and there may be limited offer on the market.

Where do we stand now?


→    The main advantage of Law 208/2021 is in our view the possibility granted to companies to now use (simple) electronic signatures or the electronic seal for signing or validating the huge amount of "paperwork" required in Romania for HR management. In our view, this provision applies mainly to the unilateral documents issuing from employers but may very well apply (e.g. via rules included in the Internal Regulations of a company) also to the documents originating from the employees, such as various types of consents or data filled in various electronic tools. This becomes a recognition of a practice used since many years ago by employers which turned to securing employee consent via various IT tools, apps and platforms.
→    Prior to GEO 36/2021 and Law 208/2021, parties could only use qualified E-signature for the valid execution of an employment contract (due to the ad validitatem requirement under the Labor Code). Now parties can also use advanced e-signatures. At the same time, from a practical perspective (availability of the product, cost vs. benefits analysis) it may be that qualified E-signature stays at the top of the employers' preferences when discussing E-signing contracts.
→    The use of symmetric signatures remains an issue. In order to sign employment contracts electronically, the employer will in fact need to procure electronic signatures for its employees. We anticipate that, at least for a while, employment contracts will mainly continue to be signed with wet ink signatures. |

About WOLF THEISS


Wolf Theiss is one of the leading European law firms in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe with a focus on international business law. With 340 lawyers in 13 countries, over 80% of the firm's work involves cross-border representation of international clients. Combining expertise in law and business, Wolf Theiss develops innovative solutions that integrate legal, financial and business know-how.

Adelina Iftime-Blăgean is a Counsel in the Bucharest office of Wolf Theiss and is the coordinator of the Employment team. Throughout her 15+ years of legal career, Adelina was involved in a wide range of transactions and projects on labor law, compliance and personal data protection, often in a transactional and / or cross-border context.
Adelina has assisted in many multi-jurisdictional and national labor law projects, such as complete range of restructurings, including collective dismissals or automatic transfers of employees, special work arrangements, cross-border retention arrangements, compliance checks at company or group level, vendor or seller due diligence processes, whistleblowing assessments, group level corporate governance implementation and unification projects, cross-border transfers of personal data, implementation of stock options and similar plans, etc.
While since more or less 10 years Adelina's work is exclusively focused on employment matters, her background in corporate-M&A and financial regulatory matters, including capital markets projects, are key to her exceptional understanding of complexities and pitfalls that one may meet in international projects such as transfers of businesses or international restructurings. Additionally, Adelina has a strong experience in data protection and compliance/corporate investigations projects, which enable her to have a complete overview of the issues and risks that may be relevant in HR context. Adelina and Wolf Theiss Romania are the Romanian members with INPLP, the International Network of Privacy Law Professionals.  

Andreea Stan is a Senior Associate in the Employment and Corporate/M&A teams of the Wolf Theiss Bucharest office. She specializes in labour law, corporate and commercial law, with a focus on transactional matters with 8+ years of experience. Andreea has previously coordinated challenging automatic transfer of employees projects (with cross-border focus, re-allocation of duties and advice on the interplay with existing position at the transferee entity level) and very complex collective dismissal projects and has supported clients with sensitive and sophisticated transactional advice (especially in transactions where employment matters play a big role) and complex negotiations with the employees. Andreea is also advising clients with difficult, multi-steps / cascading restructurings of group companies where (re)allocation of duties or reporting lines, individual/collective redundancies and intra-group resource sharing projects are the focus of the project.  Andreea has been ranked as Rising Start in Legal 500 2020 report. She graduated from the Faculty of Law, University of Bucharest and is a member of the Bucharest Bar.
 
 

PNSA

 
 

ARTICOLE PE ACEEASI TEMA

ARTICOLE DE ACELASI AUTOR


     

    Ascunde Reclama
     
     

    POSTEAZA UN COMENTARIU


    Nume *
    Email (nu va fi publicat) *
    Comentariu *
    Cod de securitate*







    * campuri obligatorii


    Articol 2209 / 4604
     

    Ascunde Reclama
     
    BREAKING NEWS
    ESENTIAL
    MAXIM ̸ Asociații asistă EMSIL TECHTRANS în tranzacția imobiliară încheiată cu METSO pentru o proprietate industrială din Oradea
    Mitel & Asociații dezvoltă o practică de litigii construită în jurul unui nucleu de avocați cu mare experiență, capabilă să ducă la capăt mandate complexe cu impact financiar și reputațional major, într-o piață în care disputele devin tot mai tehnice și mai dure | De vorbă cu Magda Dima (Partener) despre cum se construiește strategia, se evaluează riscurile și se formează generația nouă de litigatori
    RTPR, desemnată „Consultantul Juridic al Anului” la Gala ROPEA Awards 2025
    Echipa de Concurență a RTPR îmbină experiența cu precizia operațională, într-o formulă remarcată în Legal 500 și Chambers | De vorbă cu partenerii Valentin Berea și Roxana Ionescu despre modul de lucru care privilegiază consistența și rigoarea, cu rezultate ce confirmă profesionalismul și anvergura practicii
    NNDKP, Popescu & Asociații și ZRVP au cei mai mulți profesioniști listați în Benchmark Litigation - 2025. Ce avocați au intrat în liga „Litigation Stars” și prin ce s-au remarcat firmele aflate în plutonul de forță al practicii
    Mușat & Asociații confirmă, în Real Estate, forța unei echipe obișnuite să lucreze sub presiunea timpului și a reglementărilor, menținând proiectele pe un traseu sigur de la due diligence la implementare | De vorbă cu Monia Dobrescu (Partener) despre combinația de rigoare juridică, luciditate în evaluarea riscurilor și creativitate în soluții, într-o periodă plină de provocări
    NNDKP confirmă, prin practica de Litigii, că este prima opțiune pentru companiile care au nevoie de reprezentare în dosare cu miză de sute de milioane de euro, în instanțe și arbitraje la curți internaționale | De vorbă cu Emil Bivolaru (Partener Executiv) și Sorina Olaru (Partner) despre combinația dintre strategie, tehnologie și echipe capabile să ducă la capăt dosare complexe cu soluții favorabile, construite pe argumente solide, într-o piață a disputelor sofisticată
    Patru firme de avocați din România, evidențiate pentru activitatea în domeniul Competition ̸ Antitrust | NNDKP, CMS, TZA și D&B David și Baias au intrat în topul global al firmelor cu cea mai bună practică de concurență. Cine sunt avocații evidențiați de GCR 100 – 2026 și care au fost proiectele care au adus recunoaștere echipelor locale
    Filip & Company operează în segmentul cel mai sofisticat al pieței de Capital Markets, acolo unde se proiectează emisiuni pentru stat, bănci sistemice, companii listate și emitenți antreprenoriali, toate sub presiunea unui calendar strâns și a unor standarde de conformare ridicate | De vorbă cu Olga Niță (Partener) despre direcția pieței, proiectele-reper ale anului, modul în care funcționează ”laboratorul de soluții” și mecanismele interne care permit echipei să finalizeze, la timp și în siguranță, tranzacții extrem de sofisticate
    ZRVP, desemnată din nou „Firma de Avocatură a Anului din România” la Lexology Index Awards 2025 | Dr. Cosmin Vasile (Managing Partner): Un premiu obținut doi ani la rând spune un lucru simplu: că echipa merge în direcția bună. O astfel de recunoaștere confirmă nivelul profesional atins și, în același timp, ne obligă să rămânem la fel de exigenți
    Lexology Index: Arbitration - 2026 | Arbitrajul românesc nu mai este doar „prezent” în clasamentele globale, ci începe să-și contureze, în mod coerent, un ecosistem. Patru avocați, printre care Cosmin Vasile (ZRVP), Crenguța Leaua (LDDP) și Luminița Popa (Popa Legal) formează nucleul de influență al practicii. ZRVP Și LDDP au cei mai mulți profesioniști în categoriile Thought Leaders și Future Leaders. România devine un „hub” credibil în arbitrajul regional
    Fiscalitate ̸ Litigii Fiscale - Practica de Taxe a Kinstellar funcționează ca un „hub” integrat între drept, fiscalitate și finanțe, ce conturează un parcurs procedural previzibil, din faza de control al documentelor până la soluțiile finale ale instanței. Clienții beneficiază de pregătire proactivă, probatoriu robust și o echipă calibrată pentru litigii sofisticate | De vorbă cu Theodor Artenie (Counsel) și Raluca Botea (Counsel) despre tendințele ultimului an, prevenție, timing și modul de lucru al unei echipe recunoscute de directoarele internaționale
     
    Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
    • BizBanker

    • BizLeader

        in curand...
    • SeeNews

      in curand...