ZRP
Tuca Zbarcea & Asociatii

Developing Renewables in Romania: PUZ or Pass?

17 Octombrie 2022   |   Mihaela Nyerges, Partener - Vlăsceanu, Nyerges & Partners

The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate.

 
 

One of the most frequent questions asked there days by renewables investors and developers is whether PUZ is still required for developing small renewable power projects in Romania (below 50 ha). The relevance of this question is huge as the answer impacts on the duration of the development process with up to 9 months.

To answer, brief preliminary comments should be made regarding the general construction permitting rules, depending on the various types of lands.

1.          Types of lands

The following lands qualifications are relevant for the current topic:

(i)         from the perspective of their location, the lands can be (a) located intra-muros (within the buildable perimeter of the respective territorial administrative unit) or (b) located extra-muros (outside such perimeter);

(ii)       from the perspective of their destination, the lands can be, among others, (a) agricultural lands or (b) yards-constructions lands;

(iii)      from the perspective of their fertility class, the agricultural lands are split into 5 fertility classes, ranging from very fertile land (Class I) to very low fertile land (Class V); the fertility class is established based soil analysis made by experts within the county Office of Pedological Studies.

2.          General construction rule

As a general rule, all constructions may be erected only on lands (i) located intra-muros and (ii) qualifying as “yards-constructions”.

If the targeted land qualifies as extra-muros and agricultural land (which is typically the case with the land suitable for renewable projects),

(i)         the land should be first requalified from extra-muros into intra-muros land by means of a PUZ;

(ii)       no additional formalities should be done for converting the land from agricultural land to “yards-construction” land, as such conversion occurs automatically through the issuance of the building permit.

3.          Exception dedicated to renewable energy projects

Late July this year, an exception from the above rule was adopted, expressly allowing the construction of renewable power generation projects on extra-murros lands if the following conditions are met:

(i)         land has fertility class III, IV and V; and

(ii)       land does not exceed 50 ha.

Therefore, projects falling within the above limitations no longer need to obtain requalification of the land from extra-muros to intra-murros land through a PUZ.

4.          Need of a PUZ in case of renewable projects below 50 ha

Therefore, do we still need or not a PUZ for developing renewable on land with fertility class III, IV and V which does not exceeds 50 ha?

The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate. We have also encountered a case where the authority changed its mind after having issued an urban planning certificate whereby no PUZ was requested.

Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that PUZ has multiple roles, not just the introduction of land into intra-murros area, as explained below:

(i)            according to the general construction law (with certain exceptions not applicable hereto), the building permit may be issued only if (a) there is an urban documentation approved regarding the respective land, setting out the legal, technical and economical regime of the land and (b) the envisaged construction is compatible with the rules set out by the respective urban documentation;

(ii)          all communes and towns in Romania must have an urban documentation approved – namely a general urban plan (“PUG”) adopted by the local authorities setting out (a) the function of each land (such as residential, industrial etc.) and (b) the applicable urbanism parameters and limitations (such as land occupation percentage, land occupation coefficient, height regime, etc.);

(iii)        PUG is a sufficient urbanism documentation for the issuance of a building permit if (a) it provides the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land and (b) the envisaged project is compatible with the regime set out thereby;

(iv)        if (a) the PUG does not provide the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land or (b) the envisaged construction is not compatible with the rules set out by the PUG for the targeted land or (c) there is no PUG in place (for example, it was never approved, it expired, it was cancelled in court or suspended), the developer must obtain a zonal urban plan (“PUZ”) whereby to adopt/amend the urbanism rules so that they are compatible with the project;

(v)          generally, PUGs do not regulate extra-muros land or do not establish an urbanism function/regime compatible with renewable projects;

(vi)        very recently, a new exception from the need to adopt an urbanism documentation was added in case of other specific types of constructions allowed on extra murros land.

Further to the above, PUZs are still needed for developing renewable projects on lands below 50 ha in order to establish the function and urbanism parameters of the respective land that are compatible with the envisaged project. Nevertheless, a case-by-case assessment should be made regarding the PUG rules applicable on the respective land. Such assessment should be made by the consultants of the developer, without simply relying on the assessment made by the local authorities when issuing the urbanism certificate.

 
 

PNSA

 
 

ARTICOLE PE ACEEASI TEMA

ARTICOLE DE ACELASI AUTOR


 

Ascunde Reclama
 
 

POSTEAZA UN COMENTARIU


Nume *
Email (nu va fi publicat) *
Comentariu *
Cod de securitate*







* campuri obligatorii


Articol 624 / 4263
 

Ascunde Reclama
 
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
Filip & Company a asistat grupul Digi la contractarea unui două împrumuturi în valoare peste 117 mil. € și, respectiv, de 50 mil. €
Senior Lawyer Employment | Reff & Associates
Proiectul parcului fotovoltaic de la Ovidiu face un pas înainte. MPR|Partners a fost alături de EnPower Energy pentru coordonarea procedurii de obținere a acordului de construire, cu o echipă de avocați coordonată de Gelu Maravela (partener fondator) și Dana Rădulescu (partener)
Finanțele au demarat procedura de selecție a firmelor de avocați pentru un proiect ce presupune asistență consistentă în baza dreptului englez. Contract pe 3 ani, tarife orare de cca. 1.900 lei
Cine sunt și cum gândesc profesioniștii evidențiați de Legal 500 în GC Powerlist Romania | De vorbă cu Alexandru Berea, General counsel la BCR: ”Prin colaborare putem genera schimbări semnificative nu doar în interiorul profesiei noastre, ci și în societate in general. Prin natura muncii noastre, nu numai că răspundem la nevoile imediate ale societății, dar suntem și arhitecți ai viitorului acesteia, contribuind la definirea și modelarea unui cadru normativ care să orienteze comportamentul și deciziile individuale și colective pe termen lung”
Rebecca Marina, counsel în cadrul firmei Filip & Company după ultima rundă de promovări: “Am găsit aici oameni care îmi împărtășesc principiile și valorile de viață și care mi-au devenit prieteni și mentori sau pentru care eu am devenit mentor mai târziu. Orice promovare vine cu responsabilități și noi roluri în echipă”
Patru case locale de avocați rămân în topul global al celor mai bune 100 de firme implicate în arbitraje internaționale | Cum sunt prezentate în GAR 100 (2024), ce mandate au avut și ce spun clienții despre avocați și prestațiile acestora. TZA, ZRVP, LDDP și SP asistă clienți în arbitraje cu pretenții de 15,7 miliarde de dolari
Kinstellar a asistat BIG Mega Renewable Energy cu privire la finanțarea de 92 mil. € cu BERD și OTP Bank pentru construcția și operarea Parcului Eolian Urleasca
Răzvan Gheorghiu-Testa, fondator al Țuca Zbârcea & Asociații, inclus în „Top 50 Cei Mai Influenți Oameni de pe Piața Imobiliară din România”
Wolf Theiss a asistat AIRSOL în legătură cu achiziția MedAir Oxygen Solution | Emanuele Lainati, Legal Affair Manager SOL Group: “Expertiza, dedicarea și abordarea proactivă a avocaţilor Wolf Theiss au fost esențiale pentru încheierea cu succes a tranzacției”
Filip & Company a asistat Centrokinetic, în parteneriat cu Agista, în achiziția pachetului majoritar de părți sociale ale clinicii Socrates din Timișoara
Arbitrajul ICSID cerut de Nova Group Investments a ajuns la final | Statul român așteaptă decizia, după ce tribunalul a declarat închisă procedura în litigiul în care pretențiile se ridică la 345 mil. E. Ce onorarii au fost plătite firmelor de avocați care au asigurat apărarea
 
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
  • BizBanker

  • BizLeader

      in curand...
  • SeeNews

    in curand...