Romania aligns its national trade mark law with EU legislation
28 Iulie 2020 CMS Romania
For more information on this law or general advice on IP in Romania, contact your regular CMS advisor or local CMS expert Valentina Parvu.
On 9 July 2020, Law No. 112/2020 for the amendment of Romanian trade mark law No. 84/1998 was published in the Official Gazette, transposing into the national law the provisions of EU trade mark Directive No 2436/2015. Changes came into force on 12 July 2020.
Enactment of the new legislation comes days after the European Commission had decided to refer Romania to the EU Court of Justice with a request for financial sanctions following Romania's failure to issue notification for transposition of the Directive.
Law 112/2020 brings substantive changes to the existing legal framework concerning trade marks. The major changes contained in the law include:
► A revised trade mark definition, adapted to the digital age. Under Law 112/2020, the requirement for the "graphic representation" of the mark is removed. This means that new signs can now be registered as marks such as multimedia marks, hologram marks, etc.
Enactment of the new legislation comes days after the European Commission had decided to refer Romania to the EU Court of Justice with a request for financial sanctions following Romania's failure to issue notification for transposition of the Directive.
Law 112/2020 brings substantive changes to the existing legal framework concerning trade marks. The major changes contained in the law include:
► A revised trade mark definition, adapted to the digital age. Under Law 112/2020, the requirement for the "graphic representation" of the mark is removed. This means that new signs can now be registered as marks such as multimedia marks, hologram marks, etc.
► New or amended grounds for refusal or invalidation of a trade mark. In terms of absolute grounds of refusal, for example, the applicant whose mark may be rejected for lack of distinctive character and who – under the previous regime – could have reversed such a rejection only if it proved the existence of a distinctive character acquired by use before the date of application, is now permitted to invoke the distinctive character acquired after the date of application (and before the date of registration). Also, in regard to relative grounds of refusal, for example, the owner of a prior mark registered abroad who – under the previous law – could have brought a claim against an applicant acting in bad faith only if it proved the use of its trademark abroad, can under the new provisions act against a bad-faith applicant solely on the basis of the protection that its mark enjoys abroad.
► The current owners of registered marks are obliged to notify the Romanian Trade Marks Office (OSIM) by 30 September 2020 if they intended (at the date of the application) to obtain protection of products or services in a registered class, which are not covered by the literal reading of the title of that class. In absence of such a notification by the stated deadline, the protection will only refer to products or services covered by the literal reading of the title of that class.
► Reduced terms for registration; clarification and simplification of the registration procedure. The term for which OSIM can check the application on absolute grounds of refusal has been reduced from one month to seven days. Also, the terms in which the applicant must produce mandatory documents in the file or pay fees has been shortened generally from three months to 30 days. Also, there are clear deadlines by which OSIM has to act (e.g. two months to decide on an opposition). Lastly, there is now clarity on the exact date when registration is deemed finalised. This includes the date when the term for an opposition elapses or – if an opposition is filed – the date of the final decision on the opposition or the date when opposition is withdrawn.
► Changes regarding the opposition procedure, such as the introduction in national law of the “cooling-off” period (i.e. the two-month term granted by OSIM to the applicant and the opponent to negotiate for a settlement in the opposition stage).
► New grounds for right owners to act against the infringement of their marks. The trade mark owner is, for example, entitled to prevent its mark from being used as a trade name or part of the trade name, or to prohibit the mark from being used in comparative advertising in an unlawful manner. Importantly, the right owner is entitled to prohibit the transit of infringing goods in Romania. This means that the proprietor of a registered trade mark is entitled to prevent third parties from bringing goods into Romania in their course of trade without releasing them for free circulation in Romania. This is the case unless the holder of the goods provides evidence that the proprietor of the registered trade mark is not entitled to prohibit the placing of the goods on the market in the country of final destination.
► The five-year time limit for bringing an action for the cancellation of a trade mark was removed. Under the previous legislation, the unbarred action was only available when challenging a bad-faith application.
► The possibility to request cancellation or revocation of a trade mark before OSIM. Before Law 112/2020, cancellation and revocation of a trade mark could only be pursued before the competent courts of law (i.e. the Bucharest Tribunal). Beginning 14 January 2023, the interested party will have the choice to pursue these actions administratively before OSIM, whose decision in a cancellation or revocation case would be open for challenge before the Bucharest Tribunal.
The changes introduced by Law 112/2020 constitute an important step in modernising Romanian trade mark legislation. Implementing rules are expected over the next two months when the regulation for the implementation of the trade mark law must be amended to reflect these changes.
For more information on this law or general advice on IP in Romania, contact your regular CMS advisor or local CMS expert Valentina Parvu.
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
| Articol 4271 / 4664 | Următorul articol |
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
LegiTeam - Oportunitate de carieră | Avocat definitiv – Achiziții publice & Infrastructură
LegiTeam: Zamfirescu Racoţi Vasile & Partners recrutează avocat definitiv Dreptul muncii | Consultanță
Cum își pune oamenii în valoare o firmă din elita pieței | Povestea Andradei Rusan, studenta care ‘fura meserie’ în stagiile de vară ale RTPR, cucerită de focusul echipei pe rigoare juridică și de munca la cele mai înalte standarde, iar mai apoi a urcat pas cu pas până pe poziția de Counsel: „Realmente cred că RTPR este o excelentă școală de avocatură la cel mai înalt nivel. Performanța reală în avocatura de business nu e un sprint, ci un maraton”
România și Polonia, condamnate în primă instanță să plătească vaccinurile Pfizer comandate și anulate. Lexters ̸ Stănescu Vasile & Asociaţii și Strelia CVBA apără România în acest proces cu miză de 615 mil. €
Patru case locale de avocați se afirmă în topul global al celor mai bune 100 de firme implicate în arbitraje internaționale | ZRVP, Filip & Company, TZA și LDDP gestionează 30 de arbitraje în curs, cu o valoare agregată de aproximativ 4,1 miliarde de dolari și rămân pilonii prezenței românești în GAR 100, ediția 2026
CMS îi numește pe Horea Popescu și Andrzej Pośniak în rolurile de Managing Directors în Europa Centrală și de Est | Stephen Millar, Managing Partner CMS UK: ”CMS este cea mai mare firmă de avocatură din regiune și suntem convinși că Andrzej și Horea vor valorifica acest fundament solid pentru a consolida și mai mult reputația noastră de firmă de avocatură de top în ECE”
LMG Life Sciences EMEA Awards 2026 | Cinci firme sunt în cursa pentru ”Romania Firm of the Year”, o casă de avocatură locală intră în bătălia paneuropeană din White Collar Crime și un singur avocat român este nominalizat individual. Lista scurtă, pe care sunt și NNDKP și Popescu & Asociații, arată o piață în care casele independente locale continuă să conteze, dar concurează cu rețele regionale la fel de capabile să capteze mandate sofisticate în sectorul Life Sciences
Achiziții Publice | Cristina IVAN, Managing Partner Ivan şi Asociaţii: Arhitectura colectivă a ofertei - Cine ofertează, ce se evaluează, cui i se atribuie şi cine, în realitate, execută
Inflația la control | Instanța confirmă: Fiscul datorează și actualizarea cu inflația, nu doar dobânda fiscală. Soluție obținută de Băncilă, Diaconu și Asociații, cu o echipă coordonată de Emanuel Băncilă (Partener)
Dispute-Resolution.Center: România în Legal 500 EMEA (2026) – White-collar crime | O practică cu mai multe centre de putere: firmele cu activitate intensă, avocații care dau greutate practicii și dosarele care au contat în evaluare
In-houseLegal: Loredana Coraș, Country Legal Counsel la PKO Bank Polski România, distinsă cu premiul Compliance Innovator la Lexology European Awards 2026 | ”Următoarea etapă a inovației în compliance și în activitatea juridică va fi definită de capacitatea de a integra tehnologia într-un mod responsabil, fără a pierde din vedere rolul acestei funcții, acela de a proteja banca”, spune unul dintre cei mai vizibili avocați interni din Europa
Analiza de ansamblu Legal 500 EMEA - 2026: lideri, arii fanion și avocații care contează
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...









RSS





