HCCJ Decision – a landmark tax victory regarding international intra-group expenses and packaging waste recycling
30 Septembrie 2025 R. T.
In a context marked by the intensification of tax inspections on multinational groups and the increasingly restrictive practice of tax authorities regarding the deductibility of intra-group expenses, the decision is a key landmark for taxpayers that outsource services to affiliated entities or to specialized authorized operators.
| |
Mușat & Asociații successfully assisted an international retail company in a lawsuit for the annulment of administrative tax documents issued by the National Agency for Tax Administration (ANAF), following which the High Court of Cassation and Justice (HCCJ) rendered a landmark decision regarding the right to deduct intra-group purchases of services and VAT related to the services provided, as well as the purchase of services for taking responsibility for the recovery and recycling of packaging waste. The court also clarified the competence of the authorities to check the quality of the provision of those services and the way in which liability is to be divided between the economic operator contracting the services for the recovery and recycling of packaging waste, to independent economic operators and the latter.
Mușat & Asociații’s client requested the annulment of the administrative tax documents by which, on the one hand, ANAF established that the value of intra-group services is not part of the category of deductible expenses by the economic operator in Romania, establishing also the refusal to deduct the VAT corresponding to these services, with the imposition of the related ancillary taxes.
On the other hand, the tax authority proceeded with the verification of the fulfilment by Mușat & Asociații’s client of the obligations regarding the recovery and recycling of packaging waste placed on the market, holding its responsibility for their performance, given that these services had been outsourced to specialized economic operators. Consequently, the tax authority established the liability of Mușat & Asociații’s client with regard to the quality of the provision of these services, resulting in the refusal to recognize their deductibility but also in the imposition of the related ancillary taxes.
By its decision, the High Court established that the services provided by the affiliated companies are intended to ensure the continuity and improvement of the position of the company represented by Mușat & Asociații, such as to bring added economic value, rejecting ANAF’s interpretation in the sense that the value of these services does not fall within the category of deductible expenses for the calculation of corporate income tax.
The Supreme Court emphasized that the right to deduct VAT related to these services cannot be conditioned by a subjective reassessment of the economic opportunity of the services by the tax authority but must be related to their necessity and usefulness for the taxpayer’s economic activity.
At the same time, taking into account the particularities of the case, the Supreme Court held that the intra-Community acquisition of services was, in principle, a transaction falling within the scope of VAT with the right of deduction, definitively annulling the tax documents which had held the contrary.
With regard to the possibility of deducting the expenses incurred for the services of taking over responsibility for the recovery and recycling of packaging waste placed on the market when calculating corporate income tax, the High Court established that, since the company is required by the law to carry out activities relating to the management of packaging and packaging waste, but has the right to outsource the responsibility for providing them to authorized economic operators, the expenses incurred in this regard are tax deductible when calculating corporate income tax.
Therefore, the High Court of Cassation and Justice, in line with the rulings of the Bucharest Court of Appeal, decided in favour of the penalized taxpayer on the right to deduct the intra-Community purchases of services rendered by affiliates, through a detailed analysis of the transactions with the affiliates, including from the perspective of the transfer pricing file.
The High Court’s decision has the potential to set an important precedent in tax case-law, in particular on the deductibility of expenses and VAT on services rendered by affiliates and those related to legal obligations on packaging waste, in a complex regulatory framework often interpreted restrictively by tax authorities.
The favourable solution is based on the production of extremely complex evidence, including the expert’s report carried out by a commission made up of 3 (three) forensic experts, assisted by expert advisors of the parties to the dispute.
This decision was also made possible due to the emphasis placed on an in-depth evidentiary analysis, in particular on the documentation related to intra-Community services and contracts concluded with operators specialized in waste management, in conjunction with the position of independent forensic experts.
The favourable judgments obtained both in the first instance and before the appellate court are the result of cooperation of Mușat & Asociații’s lawyers within an interdisciplinary team of lawyers and tax consultants, both specialized in tax and administrative litigation, made up of Atty. Alina Man (Managing Associate), Atty. Ana Maria Burada (Managing Associate), Roxana Bujoreanu (Senior Tax Manager), Atty. Georgiana Negulescu (Senior Associate), Atty. Iuliana Negura (Associate), Atty. Cristina Ciobanu (Junior Associate), under the coordination of Partners Atty. Angela Porumb and Răzvan Graure (tax consultant).
This solution reinforces the importance of an integrated approach to tax litigation, in which legal and tax expertise converge to defend taxpayers’ rights against misinterpretation by the authorities.
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
| Articol 105 / 4685 | Următorul articol |
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
Mușat & Asociații obține o decizie de referință pentru salariații Hidroconstrucția, societate în reorganizare judiciară, cu impact estimat de 1,2 mil. € | Echipa, coordonată de Mihai Popa (Deputy Managing Partner)
Filip & Company a gestionat juridic IPO-ul Christian Tour, încheiat cu succes. Au fost atrase fonduri de 149 mil. lei pentru accelerarea consolidării prin M&A, extindere organică și transformare digitală
NNDKP a asistat Raiffeisen Bank România în legătură cu finanțarea grupului Monza Ares în vederea achiziției Brain Institute și integrării acestuia în structura grupului | Alina Radu (Partener) și Cătălina Dan (Asociat Senior), în prim plan
Mitel & Asociații a asistat vanzatorii în tranzacția prin care Grupul Monza Ares, susținut de Highlander Partners, a preluat centrul privat de neurochirurgie Brain Institute | Mădălina Mitel, coordonatoarea echipei de proiect: ”Pentru noi, un mandat de M&A reușit este acela în care soluția juridică susține logica economică a tranzacției și permite părților să meargă mai departe cu un proiect viabil”
NNDKP a asistat grupul PPC în procesul de negociere pentru încheierea noilor contracte colective de muncă | Roxana Abrașu (Partener) și Daniel Stăncescu (Managing Associate), în prim plan
RTPR asistă Silcotub la achiziția Artrom Steel Tubes. Echipa, coordonată de Mihai Ristici (Partener) și Vlad Stamatescu (Counsel)
Florian Nițu (PNSA), singurul avocat din România aflat în cursa pentru titlul „CEE Partner of the Year” la ”Legal 500 Central and Eastern Europe Awards 2026” - nu doar într-un an mai bun, ci după două decenii de consecvență în excelență: „Avocatul a devenit, în fapt, un ‘integrator’ în proiectele complexe, responsabil de alinierea componentelor juridice, comerciale și operaționale ale unei tranzacții. Clientul este azi un partener strategic, sofisticat și continuu implicat în gestionarea serviciului avocațial”
Mandatele sofisticate, în care soluțiile juridice trebuie dublate de înțelegerea mecanismelor economice, confirmă forța practicii de Insolvență & Restructurare a ZRVP, evidențiată în Tier 1 de Legal 500 | Alexandru Iorgulescu (Partener): ”Pot spune că specific practicii noastre sunt mandatele complexe ce reclamă soluții inovatoare, unde lucrăm adesea pe drumuri ‘neumblate’ și în care problemele de dreptul insolvenței se întrepătrund cu cele civile, societare, administrativ-fiscale”
NNDKP a asistat Grupul Saica în legătură cu achiziția Grupului Thimm. Echipa, cordonată de Gabriela Cacerea (Partener)
18 firme de avocatură și 22 de avocați din România, pe lista scurtă pentru Legal 500 - Central and Eastern Europe Awards 2026. Avocați de la Filip & Company, CMS, RTPR, NNDKP, TZA, Bondoc & Asociații și Schoenherr intră în competiție pentru premii regionale, iar Florian Nițu (PNSA) este nominalizat la titlul de ”CEE Partner of the Year”. Doi legal manageri concurează la titlul de ”In-house Lawyer of the Year” în CEE
Ritm alert, tranzacții de referință și expertiză recunoscută | Practica de Energie & Resurse Naturale a RTPR, Tier 1 în Legal 500, gestionează integrat mandate care combină M&A, finanțări verzi, autorizare și reglementare, oferind clienților internaționali și locali suport în proiecte cu miză ridicată. De vorbă cu partenerul Bogdan Cordoș despre tendințele anului 2026, interesul investitorilor și mandatele relevante
ZRVP organizează în data de 11 iunie 2026 dezbaterea „Contractul de antrepriză: de la FIDIC la HG 1 ̸ 2018 – evoluție, adaptare sau compromis?”
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...









RSS





