CMS | Romanian trade marks can be cancelled by the OSIM
27 Ianuarie 2023 CMS Romania
For more information on the Trade Marks Law and on other intellectual property issues affecting your Romania-based business, contact your CMS client partner or CMS experts: Cristina Popescu and Carmen Turcu.
| |
As of 14 January 2023, requests can be made with the Romanian State Office for Inventions and Trade Marks (OSIM) to cancel trade marks by using an administrative-jurisdictional procedure.
According to Romania's recently updated Trade Marks Law (Law no. 84/1998 on Trade Marks and Geographical Indications), the invalidation and revocation of a trade mark may be requested either by judicial proceedings before the Bucharest Tribunal or by administrative-jurisdictional proceedings, before the OSIM.
The possibility to file a cancellation claim before the OSIM has been newly introduced in Romanian legislation, following the transposition of the Directive (EU) 2015/2436 relating to trade marks (recast), which obliges EU member states to implement an administrative procedure for the revocation or invalidation of trade-mark rights.
According to Romania's recently updated Trade Marks Law (Law no. 84/1998 on Trade Marks and Geographical Indications), the invalidation and revocation of a trade mark may be requested either by judicial proceedings before the Bucharest Tribunal or by administrative-jurisdictional proceedings, before the OSIM.
The possibility to file a cancellation claim before the OSIM has been newly introduced in Romanian legislation, following the transposition of the Directive (EU) 2015/2436 relating to trade marks (recast), which obliges EU member states to implement an administrative procedure for the revocation or invalidation of trade-mark rights.
The administrative-jurisdictional procedure for cancellation of trade marks has been further developed by Government Emergency Ordinance no. 169/2022, which amends and supplements the Trade Marks Law, and entered into force on 13 December 2022.
The Trade Marks Law, as amended and supplemented, provides that:
♦ The administrative proceedings for cancellation are optional. In other words, these proceedings cannot prevent interested persons from filing a claim directly with the competent court.
♦ The claim is assigned to a specialised Board within the OSIM, whose members are only responsible for resolving claims for cancellation, without being involved in any other procedure on trade marks carried out by the OSIM and without interfering with the activity of the Board of Appeals within the OSIM.
♦ OSIM decisions rendered in cancellation proceedings can be appealed within 30 days of the communication before the Bucharest Tribunal. The decision of the Bucharest Tribunal is only subject to appeal before the Bucharest Court of Appeals.
♦ The claim is assigned to a specialised Board within the OSIM, whose members are only responsible for resolving claims for cancellation, without being involved in any other procedure on trade marks carried out by the OSIM and without interfering with the activity of the Board of Appeals within the OSIM.
♦ OSIM decisions rendered in cancellation proceedings can be appealed within 30 days of the communication before the Bucharest Tribunal. The decision of the Bucharest Tribunal is only subject to appeal before the Bucharest Court of Appeals.
The Trade Marks Law defines the course of a cancellation claim within the administrative-jurisdictional proceedings before the OSIM, which can be summarised as follows:
→ The cancellation claim is filed with the OSIM. The Trade Marks Law sets down the information required for the cancellation claim. The claim should be drafted in the Romanian language and include the grounds for cancellation and the supporting evidence.
→ Within five days of the registration of the claim, the secretary of the Board will check whether the claim contains all relevant information and observes the formal requirements provided by the law. The secretary will then forward the claim to the "rapporteur", who is one of the members of the Board.
→ If the claim is irregular, the claimant will be notified and will be given five days to remedy the irregularities. If the irregularities persist, the Board will reject the claim without summoning the parties.
→ If the claim is compliant, it will be served to the respondent who should reply within 30 days of the communication.
→ The reply of the respondent will be served to the claimant who can file a standpoint within ten days of the communication.
→ The parties will be summoned for a public hearing. The hearing can be secret if the public debate could damage one of the parties or public order.
→ Upon the reasoned request of the parties or where the hearing reveals a need for the filing of supplementary evidence, the hearing can be adjourned until later.
→ At the end of the debates, the Board will deliberate in secret on the decision to be taken. If the Board finds that further information or documents are required, it may reopen the case by setting a new hearing and summoning the parties.
→ In terms of a decision, the Board can:
→ Within five days of the registration of the claim, the secretary of the Board will check whether the claim contains all relevant information and observes the formal requirements provided by the law. The secretary will then forward the claim to the "rapporteur", who is one of the members of the Board.
→ If the claim is irregular, the claimant will be notified and will be given five days to remedy the irregularities. If the irregularities persist, the Board will reject the claim without summoning the parties.
→ If the claim is compliant, it will be served to the respondent who should reply within 30 days of the communication.
→ The reply of the respondent will be served to the claimant who can file a standpoint within ten days of the communication.
→ The parties will be summoned for a public hearing. The hearing can be secret if the public debate could damage one of the parties or public order.
→ Upon the reasoned request of the parties or where the hearing reveals a need for the filing of supplementary evidence, the hearing can be adjourned until later.
→ At the end of the debates, the Board will deliberate in secret on the decision to be taken. If the Board finds that further information or documents are required, it may reopen the case by setting a new hearing and summoning the parties.
→ In terms of a decision, the Board can:
► admit the claim in whole or in part, ordering the invalidation of the trade mark or the revocation of the rights conferred by the trade mark in whole or in part, as the case may be;
► reject the claim;
► take note of the withdrawal of the claim;
► take note of the settlement reached between the parties;
► declare the claim to be no longer admissible if it remained unprocessed for six months for reasons attributable to the claimant.
► reject the claim;
► take note of the withdrawal of the claim;
► take note of the settlement reached between the parties;
► declare the claim to be no longer admissible if it remained unprocessed for six months for reasons attributable to the claimant.
The Board cannot rule on the legality of civil acts based on an invalidated trade mark and on the civil effects arising from it. In this case, the matter should be referred to the competent court.
For more information on the Trade Marks Law and on other intellectual property issues affecting your Romania-based business, contact your CMS client partner or CMS experts: Cristina Popescu and Carmen Turcu.
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
| Articol 873 / 4679 | Următorul articol |
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
LegiTeam: Zamfirescu Racoţi Vasile & Partners recrutează avocat stagiar | Litigii
Cum arată, din interior, practica de insolvență a unei firme poziționată în Tier 1 de directoarele internaționale. “Clienții au așteptarea să reușim imposibilul în ultimul moment posibil”, spun Emil Bivolaru și Florentin Nanu, NNDKP, într-o discuție despre primele 72 de ore care definesc un dosar, sofisticarea mandatelor cu expuneri fiscale și motivele pentru care cadrul legislativ al reorganizării trebuie reformat structural
Advent finalizează achiziția TBI Bank în Bulgaria și România. Kinstellar, alături de Milbank LLP în calitate de lead counsel, a asistat pe tot parcursul tranzacției cu o echipă coordonată de Zsuzsa Csiki (Partener) și Mihai Stan (Managing Associate)
RTPR, alături de US EXIM în finanțarea acordată EnergoNuclear. Partenerii Victor Pădurari și Cosmin Tilea au coordonat echipa
Arhitectura juridică a unei tranzacții strategice în industria de apărare: Cum au gestionat Schoenherr și bpv Grigorescu Ștefănică preluarea Automecanica Mediaș de către Otokar
LegiTeam: Reff & Associates is looking for a 3 - 6 years Attorney at Law | Dispute Resolution
Bohâlțeanu & Asociații a asistat Christian Tour în consolidarea AnimaWings prin cooptarea unor investitori instituționali | Ionuț Bohâlțeanu (Managing Partner), coordonatorul echipei multidisciplinare: ”Tranzacția reflectă capacitatea noastră de a gestiona proiecte complexe, care implică simultan restructurări corporative, optimizarea structurilor de finanțare și alinierea unor interese diverse într-un cadru de reglementare specific”
EXCLUSIV : Judecătorii CJUE au audiat cel mai important caz de concurență venit din România până acum - Cauza C-357 ̸ 25 Groupama Asigurări. Valentin Berea (Partener RTPR) a coordonat apărarea asigurătorului român în acest caz, cu o echipă mixtă RTPR ̸ A&O Shearman, din care au făcut parte avocați din România și Ungaria | Valentin Berea, pentru BizLawyer: „Este genul de caz care te face să îți iubești profesia”
DLA Piper pierde un partener | Livia Zamfiropol pleacă la Dentons pentru a conduce practica de concurență și activitatea biroului în sectorul Pharma & Healthcare
Ghid pentru clienții sofisticați | Cine domină arbitrajul comercial din România: avocații și firmele recunoscute de Chambers, Legal 500, GAR 100 și Lexology. Dr. Cosmin Vasile se detașează ca „the leading star” pe piața locală, fiind descris de ghidurile internaționale drept cel mai complet avocat de Dispute Resolution din România. ZRVP, TZA, NNDKP, Filip & Company și PNSA au cele mai solide practici locale de arbitraj și ar trebui să fie primele alegeri ale firmelor care caută sprijin în dispute guvernamentale și corporative
Ghid pentru clienții sofisticați | Cum arată, în 2026, ierarhia firmelor internaționale de avocatură din România, creionată de Chambers Europe și Legal 500: CMS se detașează ca lider prin amploarea și diversitatea platformei sale, iar Clifford Chance își conservă profilul de firmă de referință în domeniul finanțărilor. Mai jos în clasament, dar pe podium, DLA Piper Dinu și Dentons își confirmă forța în câteva arii de practică, iar Eversheds are o prezență modestă
Dublă victorie la Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 | BACIU PARTNERS își reconfirmă poziția de lider în Proprietate Intelectuală și câștigă premiul „Romania Trademark Firm of the Year”, iar Ana-Maria BACIU este desemnată „Practitioner of the Year in Romania”
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...









RSS





