ZRP
Tuca Zbarcea & Asociatii

HCCJ Decision – a landmark tax victory regarding international intra-group expenses and packaging waste recycling

30 Septembrie 2025   |   R. T.

In a context marked by the intensification of tax inspections on multinational groups and the increasingly restrictive practice of tax authorities regarding the deductibility of intra-group expenses, the decision is a key landmark for taxpayers that outsource services to affiliated entities or to specialized authorized operators.

 
 
Mușat & Asociații successfully assisted an international retail company in a lawsuit for the annulment of administrative tax documents issued by the National Agency for Tax Administration (ANAF), following which the High Court of Cassation and Justice (HCCJ) rendered a landmark decision regarding the right to deduct intra-group purchases of services and VAT related to the services provided, as well as the purchase of services for taking responsibility for the recovery and recycling of packaging waste. The court also clarified the competence of the authorities to check the quality of the provision of those services and the way in which liability is to be divided between the economic operator contracting the services for the recovery and recycling of packaging waste, to independent economic operators and the latter.


Mușat & Asociații’s client requested the annulment of the administrative tax documents by which, on the one hand, ANAF established that the value of intra-group services is not part of the category of deductible expenses by the economic operator in Romania, establishing also the refusal to deduct the VAT corresponding to these services, with the imposition of the related ancillary taxes.

On the other hand, the tax authority proceeded with the verification of the fulfilment by Mușat & Asociații’s client of the obligations regarding the recovery and recycling of packaging waste placed on the market, holding its responsibility for their performance, given that these services had been outsourced to specialized economic operators. Consequently, the tax authority established the liability of Mușat & Asociații’s client with regard to the quality of the provision of these services, resulting in the refusal to recognize their deductibility but also in the imposition of the related ancillary taxes. 

By its decision, the High Court established that the services provided by the affiliated companies are intended to ensure the continuity and improvement of the position of the company represented by Mușat & Asociații, such as to bring added economic value, rejecting ANAF’s interpretation in the sense that the value of these services does not fall within the category of deductible expenses for the calculation of corporate income tax. 

The Supreme Court emphasized that the right to deduct VAT related to these services cannot be conditioned by a subjective reassessment of the economic opportunity of the services by the tax authority but must be related to their necessity and usefulness for the taxpayer’s economic activity.

At the same time, taking into account the particularities of the case, the Supreme Court held that the intra-Community acquisition of services was, in principle, a transaction falling within the scope of VAT with the right of deduction, definitively annulling the tax documents which had held the contrary. 

With regard to the possibility of deducting the expenses incurred for the services of taking over responsibility for the recovery and recycling of packaging waste placed on the market when calculating corporate income tax, the High Court established that, since the company is required by the law to carry out activities relating to the management of packaging and packaging waste, but has the right to outsource the responsibility for providing them to authorized economic operators, the expenses incurred in this regard are tax deductible when calculating corporate income tax. 

Therefore, the High Court of Cassation and Justice, in line with the rulings of the Bucharest Court of Appeal, decided in favour of the penalized taxpayer on the right to deduct the intra-Community purchases of services rendered by affiliates, through a detailed analysis of the transactions with the affiliates, including from the perspective of the transfer pricing file. 

The High Court’s decision has the potential to set an important precedent in tax case-law, in particular on the deductibility of expenses and VAT on services rendered by affiliates and those related to legal obligations on packaging waste, in a complex regulatory framework often interpreted restrictively by tax authorities. 
The favourable solution is based on the production of extremely complex evidence, including the expert’s report carried out by a commission made up of 3 (three) forensic experts, assisted by expert advisors of the parties to the dispute. 

This decision was also made possible due to the emphasis placed on an in-depth evidentiary analysis, in particular on the documentation related to intra-Community services and contracts concluded with operators specialized in waste management, in conjunction with the position of independent forensic experts. 

The favourable judgments obtained both in the first instance and before the appellate court are the result of cooperation of Mușat & Asociații’s lawyers within an interdisciplinary team of lawyers and tax consultants, both specialized in tax and administrative litigation, made up of Atty. Alina Man (Managing Associate), Atty. Ana Maria Burada (Managing Associate), Roxana Bujoreanu (Senior Tax Manager), Atty. Georgiana Negulescu (Senior Associate), Atty. Iuliana Negura (Associate), Atty. Cristina Ciobanu (Junior Associate), under the coordination of Partners Atty. Angela Porumb and Răzvan Graure (tax consultant). 

This solution reinforces the importance of an integrated approach to tax litigation, in which legal and tax expertise converge to defend taxpayers’ rights against misinterpretation by the authorities.    

 
 

PNSA

 
 

ARTICOLE PE ACEEASI TEMA

ARTICOLE DE ACELASI AUTOR


 

Ascunde Reclama
 
 

POSTEAZA UN COMENTARIU


Nume *
Email (nu va fi publicat) *
Comentariu *
Cod de securitate*







* campuri obligatorii


Articol 15 / 4595
 

Ascunde Reclama
 
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
VIDEO-INTERVIURI ESENȚIALE | Horea Popescu, Managing Partner CMS Romania și Head of CEE Corporate M&A: De când coordonez practica de fuziuni și achiziții în CEE, este pentru prima dată când numărul tranzacțiilor din România este cel mai mare din regiune după primele nouă luni. A fost un an interesant din perspectiva private equity, însă investitorii strategici rămân în continuare cei de bază. Toate ariile de practică au fost foarte ocupate, dar finanțările și departamentul de Banking, cu mandate ce însumează 3 miliarde euro, ”poartă coroana” anul acesta
‘Leading lawyers’ in Romania | RTPR, NNDKP, CMS, TZA și PNSA au cei mai mulți avocaţi recomandaţi de IFLR 1000, ediția 2025. Ce firme sunt recomandate în practicile de M&A, Banking & Finance, Capital markets și Project development
Practica de Concurență de la Băncilă, Diaconu și Asociații își confirmă maturitatea prin claritate și execuție disciplinată, luciditate tactică și robustețe în decizie | De vorbă cu Claudia Grosu (Managing Associate) despre modul de lucru al unei echipe care anticipează, ordonează pașii esențiali și finalizează impecabil mandatele dificile
Într-un an cu investigații mai tehnice și presiune pe termene, DLA Piper România așază practica de Concurență pe trei piloni - oameni, metodă, ritm, astfel încât proiectarea strategiilor, controlul probelor și continuitatea între faze să producă cele mai bune rezultate | De vorbă cu membrii unei echipe sudate, condusă de lideri cu experiență și antrenată pe industrii sensibile, despre prudență juridică și curaj tactic, cooperare internă și rigoare probatorie, bazate pe înțelegerea fină a mediului de business și utilizarea tehnologiei ca multiplicator de acuratețe
CMS, alături de Buildcom EOOD la achiziția Argus în România. Echipă pluridisciplinară, cu Rodica Manea (Corporate M&A) și Cristina Reichmann în prim plan
Filip & Company a acordat asistență juridică companiei Instant Factoring în structurarea și implementarea unui parteneriat transfrontalier de securitizare în valoare de 30 de milioane EUR cu un fond din Luxemburg
Schoenherr a asistat fondatorii Calla Oradea în vânzarea unei participații majoritare către Integral Capital Group I Echipa, coordonată de Mădălina Neagu (partner)
Mușat & Asociații anunță cooptarea fostei președinte a Curții Supreme, Corina Corbu, în poziția de Partener Coordonator al Departamentului de Litigii | Gheorghe Mușat, Senior Partner: ”Este un mare câștig pentru firmă, pentru avocații firmei, pentru clienții firmei”
Filip & Company a oferit asistență juridică în legătură cu o nouă emisiune de obligațiuni corporative garantate de către Agroserv Măriuța, în valoare de 3 mil. €
Kinstellar asistă Integral Capital Group în achiziția unei participații majoritare la clinica de fertilizare in vitro Calla, prin subsidiara sa Embryos
Filip & Company a asistat consorțiul de bănci care a intermediat a doua emisiune de obligațiuni prin care Romgaz a atras 500 de mil. € de pe piețele internaționale| Alexandru Bîrsan (managing partner) și Olga Niță (partener) au coordonat echipa
Filip & Company a asistat BCR și BRD în legătură cu oferta publică inițială a Cris Tim Family Holding | Olga Niță (partener) și Alexandru Bîrsan (managing partner) au coordonat echipa
 
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
  • BizBanker

  • BizLeader

      in curand...
  • SeeNews

    in curand...