Developing Renewables in Romania: PUZ or Pass?
17 Octombrie 2022 Mihaela Nyerges, Partener - Vlăsceanu, Nyerges & Partners
The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate.
| |
One of the most frequent questions asked there days by renewables investors and developers is whether PUZ is still required for developing small renewable power projects in Romania (below 50 ha). The relevance of this question is huge as the answer impacts on the duration of the development process with up to 9 months.
To answer, brief preliminary comments should be made regarding the general construction permitting rules, depending on the various types of lands.
1. Types of lands
The following lands qualifications are relevant for the current topic:
(i) from the perspective of their location, the lands can be (a) located intra-muros (within the buildable perimeter of the respective territorial administrative unit) or (b) located extra-muros (outside such perimeter);
(ii) from the perspective of their destination, the lands can be, among others, (a) agricultural lands or (b) yards-constructions lands;
(iii) from the perspective of their fertility class, the agricultural lands are split into 5 fertility classes, ranging from very fertile land (Class I) to very low fertile land (Class V); the fertility class is established based soil analysis made by experts within the county Office of Pedological Studies.
2. General construction rule
As a general rule, all constructions may be erected only on lands (i) located intra-muros and (ii) qualifying as “yards-constructions”.
If the targeted land qualifies as extra-muros and agricultural land (which is typically the case with the land suitable for renewable projects),
(i) the land should be first requalified from extra-muros into intra-muros land by means of a PUZ;
(ii) no additional formalities should be done for converting the land from agricultural land to “yards-construction” land, as such conversion occurs automatically through the issuance of the building permit.
3. Exception dedicated to renewable energy projects
Late July this year, an exception from the above rule was adopted, expressly allowing the construction of renewable power generation projects on extra-murros lands if the following conditions are met:
(i) land has fertility class III, IV and V; and
(ii) land does not exceed 50 ha.
Therefore, projects falling within the above limitations no longer need to obtain requalification of the land from extra-muros to intra-murros land through a PUZ.
4. Need of a PUZ in case of renewable projects below 50 ha
Therefore, do we still need or not a PUZ for developing renewable on land with fertility class III, IV and V which does not exceeds 50 ha?
The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate. We have also encountered a case where the authority changed its mind after having issued an urban planning certificate whereby no PUZ was requested.
Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that PUZ has multiple roles, not just the introduction of land into intra-murros area, as explained below:
(i) according to the general construction law (with certain exceptions not applicable hereto), the building permit may be issued only if (a) there is an urban documentation approved regarding the respective land, setting out the legal, technical and economical regime of the land and (b) the envisaged construction is compatible with the rules set out by the respective urban documentation;
(ii) all communes and towns in Romania must have an urban documentation approved – namely a general urban plan (“PUG”) adopted by the local authorities setting out (a) the function of each land (such as residential, industrial etc.) and (b) the applicable urbanism parameters and limitations (such as land occupation percentage, land occupation coefficient, height regime, etc.);
(iii) PUG is a sufficient urbanism documentation for the issuance of a building permit if (a) it provides the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land and (b) the envisaged project is compatible with the regime set out thereby;
(iv) if (a) the PUG does not provide the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land or (b) the envisaged construction is not compatible with the rules set out by the PUG for the targeted land or (c) there is no PUG in place (for example, it was never approved, it expired, it was cancelled in court or suspended), the developer must obtain a zonal urban plan (“PUZ”) whereby to adopt/amend the urbanism rules so that they are compatible with the project;
(v) generally, PUGs do not regulate extra-muros land or do not establish an urbanism function/regime compatible with renewable projects;
(vi) very recently, a new exception from the need to adopt an urbanism documentation was added in case of other specific types of constructions allowed on extra murros land.
Further to the above, PUZs are still needed for developing renewable projects on lands below 50 ha in order to establish the function and urbanism parameters of the respective land that are compatible with the envisaged project. Nevertheless, a case-by-case assessment should be made regarding the PUG rules applicable on the respective land. Such assessment should be made by the consultants of the developer, without simply relying on the assessment made by the local authorities when issuing the urbanism certificate.
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
| Articol 1041 / 4679 | Următorul articol |
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |
LegiTeam: Reff & Associates is looking for a Junior Associate | Dispute Resolution
Dispute-Resolution.Center: Arbitrajul pentru Casa Radio intră într-o fază critică: Cerere reconvențională substanțială depusă de Plaza Centers și o ruptură neașteptată de echipa sa de avocați din Londra
Cum se construiește o practică solidă de achiziții publice într-o piață marcată de presiunea termenelor, complexitatea proiectelor și exigențe tot mai ridicate de conformitate | De vorbă cu Ramona Pentilescu, Partener PNSA, despre sofisticarea mandatelor și despre modul în care echipa îmbină rigoarea juridică și pragmatismul operațional pentru a menține proiectele pe traiectoria stabilită, indiferent de obstacolele apărute pe parcurs
Codezilla și Țuca Zbârcea & Asociații lansează Benvolio, o platformă AI pentru domeniile juridic și fiscal | Gabriel Zbârcea (Managing Partner - TZA): Platforma este deja utilizată zilnic în cadrul echipei noastre
KPMG Legal – Toncescu și Asociații, alături de BERD în vânzarea Portului Giurgiulești (Republica Moldova). Asistența juridică a fost coordonată de Laura Toncescu și Dragoș Iamandoiu
ZRVP și Wolf Theiss vor găzdui pe 3 iunie 2026 un eveniment VIAC pe tema parcursului profesional în arbitrajul internațional
ZRVP, distinsă cu titlul de “Romania Patent Firm of the Year” la gala Managing IP Awards 2026 | De vorbă cu Alina Tugearu (Partener) despre proprietatea intelectuală ca teren de strategie, prevenție și confruntare juridică în dosare cu miză ridicată: ”Am convingerea că implicarea în unele dintre cele mai sofisticate și relevante dosare din piață a contribuit la recunoașterea de care ne bucurăm azi”
Kinstellar își consolidează prezența pe axa italo-română prin cooptarea lui Daniele Iàcona, care preia coordonarea biroului dedicat clienților italieni | El va extinde relațiile Kinstellar cu clienții italieni și casele de avocatură partenere, în coordonare cu echipele regionale ale firmei
LegiTeam: GNP Guia Naghi and Partners is recruiting new talent | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
CMS a fost alături de Oresa în vânzarea participației deținute la RBC, cu o echipă condusă de partenerii Horea Popescu și Eva Talmacsi (UK). O echipă coordonată de Ana Radnev (Partner) a asistat și creditorii în finanțarea sindicalizată asociată tranzacției
LegiTeam: Reff & Associates is looking for a 3 - 6 years Attorney at Law | Dispute Resolution
EXCLUSIV : Judecătorii CJUE au audiat cel mai important caz de concurență venit din România până acum - Cauza C-357 ̸ 25 Groupama Asigurări. Valentin Berea (Partener RTPR) a coordonat apărarea asigurătorului român în acest caz, cu o echipă mixtă RTPR ̸ A&O Shearman, din care au făcut parte avocați din România și Ungaria | Valentin Berea, pentru BizLawyer: „Este genul de caz care te face să îți iubești profesia”
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...









RSS





